If you get hit by a Tesla and the driver tells you “Autopilot was on,” your next question is usually the same: So who’s actually at fault? The driver? Tesla? Both?
Here’s the truth in California: Autopilot is still considered driver assistance, not self driving. That matters because it shapes liability, insurance coverage, and the evidence you need to preserve immediately after the crash. Regulators and courts have been paying closer attention to how these systems are marketed and used, including recent action by the California DMV over “Autopilot” and “Full Self Driving” terminology.
Autopilot is not a robot driver under California law
Under California law, a driver remains legally responsible even when Autopilot is engaged. California Vehicle Code § 38750 makes clear that autonomous technology does not eliminate the human driver’s duty. Unless a vehicle is operating under a special DMV autonomous vehicle permit, a driver must remain seated at the wheel, actively monitor the roadway, and be capable of immediately taking control of the vehicle at all times. In other words, Autopilot does not replace the driver—it assists them, and the legal responsibility for safe operation still rests with the human behind the wheel.
Federal safety regulators classify Tesla autopilot as driver assistance
Tesla’s Basic Autopilot is described in federal recall documents as an SAE Level 2 advanced driver assistance system, meaning the human driver is supposed to supervise the driving task at all times and be ready to take over. That distinction got even more attention after NHTSA pushed Tesla to roll out an Autopilot related recall affecting about 2 million vehicles to add safeguards aimed at driver engagement and system misuse.
NHTSA’s investigation materials also describe concerns that Autopilot controls and monitoring could be insufficient in certain foreseeable situations, increasing the risk of driver disengagement. So when a Tesla driver says “the car was driving,” that does not automatically shift responsibility off the driver in a typical California crash claim.
But Autopilot can still become a liability issue in your case
Autopilot only becomes legally relevant when it affects how the crash happened or how the driver behaved. The fact that Autopilot was turned on does not automatically change liability. What matters is whether reliance on the system contributed to the collision.
If the driver relied on Autopilot in an unreasonable way, or if the system behaved unpredictably in a real-world driving situation, a claim can extend beyond a routine rear-end or intersection crash. In some cases, it can evolve into a multi-party case involving:
- The Tesla driver, for negligence such as inattention, failure to brake, unsafe lane changes, or excessive speed.
- Tesla, under product liability theories such as design defect, failure to warn, or misleading representations, depending on the evidence and expert analysis.
- Other parties, including another driver, a road contractor, or a government entity, if roadway design or maintenance played a role.
Courts have shown they are willing to examine Autopilot-related evidence when the facts support it. In a Florida Autopilot case that went to trial in 2025, a jury found Tesla partially responsible and awarded significant damages, including punitive damages. While that case was decided under Florida law and is not binding in California, it illustrates how juries may respond when evidence suggests a driver-assistance system contributed to foreseeable misuse or unsafe outcomes.
Can I sue Tesla if the driver was using autopilot?
The short answer is not automatically, but sometimes, yes. In most California crashes involving a Tesla, the primary responsibility still rests with the human driver, even if Autopilot was engaged.
However, Tesla can become part of a lawsuit when the facts show that Autopilot itself played a meaningful role in the crash. This typically happens only in specific situations, such as:
- When the system failed in a foreseeable driving scenario, such as not braking, not recognizing stopped traffic, or responding unpredictably in conditions a reasonable driver would expect the vehicle to handle with supervision.
- When warnings or limitations were inadequate, unclear, or insufficient to prevent foreseeable misuse of the system.
- When system design or monitoring allowed extended inattention, making it easier for a driver to disengage instead of remaining alert.
- When evidence shows a gap between how the system was presented and how it actually performed, contributing to unsafe reliance.
These claims fall under product liability theories like design defect, failure to warn, or misrepresentation, and they require detailed evidence, technical data, and expert analysis. They are not assumed simply because Autopilot was turned on.
What you should do right after the crash
What you do in the hours and days after a crash involving a Tesla can make or break your case. When a driver claims Autopilot was engaged, evidence disappears faster than most people realize.
- First, take care of your health. Call 911 and get medical attention, even if you think you’re “just sore.” Head, neck, and back injuries often show up later, and delays in treatment are one of the first things insurance companies use to question a claim.
- Document the scene as best you can. If you’re physically able, take photos or videos of the vehicles, damage, skid marks, debris, and the surrounding area. If the Tesla’s screen is visible and showing any driver-assistance mode, document that too. Small details matter more than you think.
- Ask simple questions and write down the answers. If the Tesla driver says Autopilot was on, note exactly what they said. Don’t argue. Don’t speculate. Just document their words while the memory is fresh.
- Get witness information immediately. Independent witnesses often disappear within days. A name and phone number can be more valuable than hours of later investigation.
- Do not assume the police report tells the full story. Many reports simply repeat what a driver claims without verifying whether Autopilot was actually engaged. The report is a starting point, not proof.
- Be cautious with insurance calls. You are not required to give a recorded statement to the other driver’s insurer right away. Early statements are often used to lock you into a version of events before all facts are known.
- Preserve evidence early. Vehicle data, dashcam footage, nearby business video, and phone records can be overwritten or lost. Once that happens, it cannot be recovered.
- Talk to a lawyer before the evidence window closes. Cases involving Autopilot are not routine car accidents. They are evidence-driven and time-sensitive. Waiting too long can limit who can be held accountable.
If a Tesla driver’s use of Autopilot played a role in your crash, getting clear answers early matters. A car accident lawyer at Bojat Law Group can help you understand who may be responsible and what steps protect your claim. Call (818) 877-4878 to talk it through.
Share:
Skip to content